Source Documentation: “May the SOURCE Be with You…”

Lack of consistent, clear, and adequate source documentation is one of the most typical inspection results in investigator site inspections. This is also the most discovered flaw during sponsor audits. To guarantee that the study results are established on the foundation of trustworthy and legitimate data, investigator sites must be reminded of the need for good documentation practices. 

The origins of excellent documentation standards can be found in the (International Conference of Harmonizaton - Good Clinical Practice) ICH-GCP, which defines source data and source documents. 

 ICH E6 1.51 source data 

This includes all original documents and authenticated copies of original records of clinical results, observations, or other activities in a clinical trial that are required for the trial's restoration and assessment. The documents containing source data are referred to as sources. 

ICH E6 1.52 source documents 

This includes original documents, data, and records such as hospital records, clinical and office charts.  The ALCOA-C acronym (attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original, accurate and complete) was coined by the US Food and Drug Administration to describe key characteristics of acceptable documentation. The World Health Organization has also adopted these. These requirements have changed over time. More 'letters' have been added by the EMA to indicate features of good source documentation, particularly for computerized systems. 

 Common Findings Associated with Source Documentation 

Following are the common findings associated with source documentation: 

  1.  It was not possible to validate the eligibility criteria. 
  2. Because there were multiple entries for the same data point, it was impossible to tell which one was the correct source record. 
  3. Inconsistencies in records were used to corroborate the study's primary effectiveness outcome. 
  4. Abnormal lab values were not indicated on lab reports nor any contradicting material gathered in source documentation have been shown clinical importance. 
  5. Missing pieces of information from subject interview scales, a slew of unexplained revisions months after the initial entries, and contradictory data; erroneous subject identification, inaccurate date were identified. 
  6. Factually inaccurate paperwork regarding drug disposition—dates, amount, and subject use were found.  

How Can Documentation Be Improved? 

Documentation can be improved by the following ways:

  • Give PI the responsibility to assign tasks to the trained staff. 
  • Commitment and continuous presence must be acknowledged by the Principal Investigator (PI) throughout the study. 
  • Sites conducting the study must prepare SOPs which ought to be shared with the Contract Research Organization (CRO) or study sponsor. 
  • All technical aspects must be clear of confusions and errors prior to starting work on any study.
  • The sponsor and/or the CRO ensure PI's commitment to the study.  

 Conclusion 

The ALCOA-C and other properties indicated by regulatory agencies and GCP should be demonstrated in source documents. During regular audits, the most frequently stated findings are those linked to source documentation. The PI's dedication to the trial and participation in it makes a tremendous difference. Efforts to educate sites, understand their practices from the pre-study visit onwards, and to monitor and train them on a regular basis will all aid in increasing and sustaining the quality of site source documentation procedures. 

 

References 

“ALCOA”: Elements of good documentation. (n.d.). Retrieved October 24, 2021, from https://blink.ucsd.edu/research/policies-compliance-ethics/compliance/ALCOA-Standards-210304.pdf. 

Bargaje, C. (2011, April). Good documentation practice in clinical research. Perspectives in clinical research. Retrieved October 24, 2021, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3121265/. 

Commissioner, O. of the. (n.d.). List - ich guidance documents. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved October 24, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/science-research/clinical-trials-and-human-subject-protection/ich-guidance-documents. 

GLP documentation. (2007). Good Laboratory Practice Regulations, 241–258. https://doi.org/10.3109/9780849375842-11  

 

 

Related Posts

3 Surefire Ways your TMF can extend your Inspection

The Trial Master File (TMF) is the backbone of the clinical trial. It consists of essential documents which not only enable the conduct of a clinical trial, but also enable the evaluation of the quality of data produced. One of the questions asked at the beginning of...

read more...

Key Aspects of an Inspection Ready TMF

Having a complete Trial Master File (TMF) is the highest priority for sponsors in terms of providing an accurate picture of the affiliated clinical trial.   This article speaks about key aspects and techniques to implement in order to have an inspection-ready TMF. Key...

read more...

Steps on Implementing a Clinical QMS

By Afifa F. - 2K Clinical Consulting, Inc.     There is a popular saying in quality management that if you do not have the process written down, then it probably didn't happen. Just like any other business, Clinical trials must have a management system as well. This...

read more...

All About Protocol Deviations

The protocol for a clinical trial describes the entire study in detail, including the operational details of how it should be carried out. The purpose of the study protocol is to protect the health and safety of study participants while also proving efficacy of the...

read more...

FDA vs EMA in Terms of GCP Inspections

The national and global regulations for conducting clinical trials involving human participants are known as Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP). They include not only quality criteria, but also regulatory guidelines to ensure that all newly created pharmaceuticals and...

read more...

3 Ways to Close the Diversity Gap in Clinical Trials

The selection of the appropriate research participants is critical to the success of any clinical trial. Regrettably, the majority of clinical trials done are severely lacking in diversity. All too frequently, cultural and genetic factors unique to Asians,...

read more...

Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety

Recently approved medications and those already on the market can benefit from pharmacovigilance to help ensure patient safety. While pharmacovigilance practices are highly regulated in the context of clinical trials, post-marketing incidence reporting is not properly...

read more...

Inspection Readiness Checklists: 

The Benefits & How to Utilize Them Checklists are invaluable tools in Inspection Readiness programs within regulated industry of pharmaceutical, medical device and biotech companies. They provide a structured approach to ensure that all necessary preparations are...

read more...

Why Quality is Everyone’s Business

World Quality Day, celebrated on a global scale every year on the second Thursday in November, serves as a reminder that quality is not just a buzzword or a department in your organization—it's everyone's business. Whether you work in clinical operations, healthcare,...

read more...

The Iceberg Illusion of Inspection Readiness

Inspection readiness often looks effortless from the outside. A clean TMF.Confident site staff.Minimal findings.A smooth inspection close-out. When an FDA or regulatory inspection goes well, it’s easy to assume the organization was simply “always inspection-ready.”...

read more...

Live Training Notification Request

Be among the first to hear about upcoming live training events, invited presentations, registration opportunities, and personalized onsite training options.

You will be notified when we have live trainings.